Muscular Potential Calculator

Estimate your modelled natural lean-mass ceiling using height, frame context, and body-fat inputs.

ImperialMetric
Sex
Height
5 ft 10 in
Current Weight
180 lbs
Current Body Fat %
15%
Need a body-fat estimate? Estimate Body Fat %.
Wrist Circumference
6.9 in
Target Body Fat %
12%
88
% of Potential
Advanced

You are approaching upper natural potential and progress usually slows.

Current Lean Mass
152.9 lbs
Modelled Max Lean Mass
173.3 lbs
Remaining Lean Mass
20.4 lbs
Weight at Target BF%
196.9 lbs
Current Normalized FFMI
22.08
Ceiling Normalized FFMI
25
STAGELEAN MASSWT @ TARGET BF%
Novice Build121.3 lbs137.8 lbs
Intermediate Build142.1 lbs161.5 lbs
Advanced Build159.4 lbs181.1 lbs
Modelled Ceiling173.3 lbs196.9 lbs
40607590100110120
EarlyDevelopingAdvancedNear ceilingAt/above
Advanced

Muscular Potential Interpretation

This compares your current lean mass against a frame-adjusted natural muscular ceiling model.

RANGECATEGORY
0-60
Early Stage

You are still far from modelled muscular ceiling. Highest growth potential remains.

60-75
Developing

Solid progress phase. Most lifters still have substantial lean-mass runway.

75-90
Advanced

You are approaching upper natural potential and progress usually slows.

90-100
Near Ceiling

Close to modelled ceiling. Improvements tend to be incremental and harder won.

100+
At/Above Model Ceiling

Current lean mass is at or above the modelled ceiling. Re-check body-fat and measurement inputs.

What This Muscular Potential Calculator Estimates

This tool estimates a modelled natural lean-mass ceiling by combining height-normalized FFMI limits with frame-size context from wrist-to-height ratio. It then compares your current lean mass to that ceiling.

Model Logic

The calculator uses a practical sequence:

  1. Estimate current lean mass from body weight and body-fat percentage.
  2. Estimate frame-size context from height-to-wrist ratio.
  3. Apply a frame-adjusted normalized-FFMI ceiling and convert to lean-mass potential.
  4. Compare current lean mass against ceiling and estimate weight at chosen target body fat.

This is a heuristic tool for planning and trend context, not a physiological hard limit.

How To Use It In Practice

If utilization is low, the focus is usually building training quality and consistency. If utilization is high, realistic expectations should shift toward slower gains and better measurement precision.

For direct FFMI comparison, use the FFMI Calculator. For frame context, use the Body Frame Size Calculator. For natural-vs-suspicious screening context, compare with the Natty or Not Calculator.

If you want an anthropometric bodybuilding model using wrist and ankle structure, compare with the Casey Butt Calculator.

If you want a single composite score blending structure leverage and projected potential, use the Bodybuilding Genetics Calculator.

Limitations

Model outputs are sensitive to body-fat error. Underestimating body fat can inflate lean-mass and potential-utilization outputs. Hydration, glycogen, and inconsistent measurement timing can also shift results.

Genetics, training age, sport history, and injury history are not fully captured by simplified anthropometric models.

References

  • Kouri EM, et al. Fat-free mass index in users and nonusers of anabolic-androgenic steroids.PubMed record
  • Cintineo HP, et al. Sport differences in fat-free mass index in NCAA athletes.PubMed record
  • Helms ER, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest prep.PubMed record